A Step-by-Step Guide to Brewing Chinese Tea

Lester B. Pearson and the Suez Canal Crisis - 1449 Words

The Suez crisis was a conflict that could have easily turned into a third World War. With a battle between the Israelis and Egyptians at Sinai, the British and French invasion of Egypt, and nuclear threats from the Soviet Union, all of the elements were present to escalate the conflict and pull other countries into the fray. Canada had no direct ties to the Suez crisis, in terms of control or economic interest. However, Canadian Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Lester B. Pearson, persuaded the UN General Assembly to send in the United Nations Emergency Force. Even though Lester B. Pearson dismayed the Commonwealth with his measures for peace, Canada was recognized for starting the first ever United Nations Peacekeeping mission.†¦show more content†¦The Israeli advance towards the canal is a fake to show the world that Egypt in danger of being overthrown by the Israelis. The British and French then dissimulate as peacekeepers, trying to diffuse then tension between Egy pt and Israel. They offer Nasser an ultimatum: â€Å"Israel and Egypt are to cease fighting or the two Western powers will intervene†. On the 31st of October this ultimatum expires and France and Britain attack, bombing Alexandria and sending in thousands of troops. Russia then threatens Britain and France with Nuclear weapons. At this point it looks as though the world is on the brink of another World War. Canada had no interest to the Suez crisis, in terms of control, economic or military interest, but Lester B. Pearson saw an opportunity to intervene. While the Cabinet in Ottawa debated about the attack on Egypt, the UN Security Council met in New York. Even though Canada did not have a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council, Lester B. Pearson and the Foreign Affairs delegation of Canada worked towards building an agreement for the proposal to the UN, on the Suez Crisis. Encouraged by the US, Yugoslavia makes a â€Å"Uniting for Peace resolution†, which enables a debate to be moved to the General Assembly. The UK and France do not block this, however, negative votes would not constitute a veto. The Suez CanalShow MoreRelatedEssay about The Establishment of the United Nations Emergency Force705 Words   |  3 PagesUN states voted in favor of Lester Pearson’s idea of establishing a large scale peacekeeping force. 1 This large scale peacekeeping force wou ld be known as the United Nations Emergency Force ( UNEF) and would be responsible to securing an end to the Suez Crisis. The idea was for the British,French and Israeli forces to withdraw from the canal and the UNEF would remain in the canal area stabilizing the situation. 2 The UNEF was responsible for looking after the Suez Canal, facilitating the departureRead MoreLester B. Pearson: 14th Prime Minister of Canada757 Words   |  3 Pagespeace or extinction. † 1 and Lester B. Pearson was definitely a man of peace. To those who don’t know who Lester B. Pearson is, he’s the fourteenth Prime Minister of Canada, that served from April 22. 1963 - April 20. 1968 2. During his time as Prime Minister, he’s accomplished many things, and that’s why I believe that Lester B. Pearson is the greatest Canadian. Not many people recognize what the Suez Crisis is, but to those who do, they all know that Lester B. Pearson played a crucial role in theRead MoreCanada, A Rising Middle Power1636 Words   |  7 PagesCanada and the UN without referring to Lester Pearson. Almost elected as the first Secretary General, Pearson believed that â€Å"Canada had a responsibility to participate as actively as possible in any international activity that might lessen the chance of wars breaking out,†6. Pearson, one of Canadas most recognized diplomats, saw the potential in the UN to maintain world peace, but in order to do this it needed a military force in order to be effective7. Pearson was instrumental in the creation ofRead MoreLester B Pearson1167 Words   |  5 Pagesto mind is Lester Bowles Pearson. He did not shape the world’s history but he did shape Canada’s history; he made Canada to what it is today, he introduced Universal Medicare to all Canadians, and he created the United Nations peacekeeping force. To begin, Lester B. Pearson helped make Canada. He made it to what it is to this day, he is the Prime Minister â€Å"who gave Canada the identity that we have today† (thegauntlet.ca). One of the things he did was give Canada its flag. Pearson went to theRead MoreThe Cold War During World War II2269 Words   |  10 Pagessupported by the Unites States’ forces. Canada which supported United States sent out twenty six thousand military personal and five-hundred sixteen Canadians died as part of this conflict. Another event that took place during the Cold War is the Suez Crisis. Furthermore, another important event during the Cold War was the Arms Race. As the atomic bomb dropped two times in Japan, concluding World War II, a new weapon was introduced to the world. This new weapon showed how much devastating humans areRead MoreThe Actions of Three Great Men and How They Made Canada Stronger900 Words   |  4 Pageshad a â€Å"weak† view of the nation. During the 2 0th century, there were however 3 men that did prove that they did what they did not just only for themselves, but for the commonwealth of the population. These 3 men, William Lyon Mackenzie King, Lester Bowles Pearson, and Pierre Elliot Trudeau shaped Canada in making Canada stronger. William Lyon Mackenzie King was the 10th Prime Minister of Canada. During his time in office, he created the Unemployment Insurance Act, formed the Old Age Pensions ActRead MoreCanada s Sovereign And Morally Just Approach1514 Words   |  7 Pageshighly involved in global issues and has held itself on moral grounds, despite some opposing influence. Canada’s sovereign and morally just approach can be seen in many events in the 20th century, such as in the Second World War, the Korean War, the Suez Crisis and the Vietnam War. As well, Canada’s imperfect, yet improving immigration policy displays the acceptance and unbiased approach Canada has towards people of different backgrounds. Despite some minor missteps and impediments, Canada would make anRead MoreCanada During the Post-War Period1190 Words   |  5 Pagesthey are today. Surfacing tension between French-English speaking Canadians lead Lester B. Pearson to establish the Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Bicul turalism in 1963 (Beyond Words - Issue 5). This set up would seek advice on how to run a country on partnership between two founding races. This also stated that English and French Canadians must be equal and that the government must function in both languages. Pearson was in fear that if Quebeckers felt as if they didn’t belong to Canada that theRead MoreCanada s Role During The World Since 19451062 Words   |  5 Pagesrole in the drafting of the UN Charter. John Humphrey is often given credit for drafting the Charter of the UN. The Canadian Prime Minister at the time, Lester B. Pearson played a key role in solving many of the problems the UN faced. Lester Pearson even received the Nobel Peace Prize for resolving a major problem the UN faced; the Suez Crisis. After WWII had ended, a Cold War broke out between the 2 superpowers of the world at the time, the United States and the Soviet Union. It was a war foughtRead MoreThe End Of The Second World War Essay1640 Words   |  7 Pagesescalation in Korea that could have ended in WWIII.† Indeed, preventing the negative consequences of a decisive American victory against North Korea was critical in the Canadian government’s view. For over a year while the war was still raging, Lester B. Pearson, Secretary of State for External Affairs of Canada and President of the General Assembly of the United Nations, exercised a diplomacy of constraint to restrain the American role in Korea and led the negotiations between the USA and China. Canada

Ethical Dilemma Is A Decision Making Problemâ€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Ethical Dilemma Is A Decision Making Problem? Answer: Introduction The ethical dilemma is a decision making problem where it make the conflicts with moral imperative which is never acceptable or preferable. The complexity in ethical dilemma always makes some situation where it conflicts with the results to obey the ethical paradoxes. Each and every person has their own moral imperatives and completely personal ethics which they apply in their own way. Dilemma only formed when those ethics are making the conflicts between the imperative and personal ethics (Fahie 2014). A workplace is always considered as an important part of our society where the dilemmas and individuals make the conflict according to the variety of socio economic background and believes (Lachman, 2014). Therefore the employees faces several ethical issues in the workplace where the employers sometimes directly or indirectly liable for those issues due to the breach of ethical consideration and make the ethical issues which is recognized as ethical dilemma (Vardaman, Gondo and Allen 2014). Dilemma description For the employees several ethical issues can arise where they need to deal with their job where the employers make several rules as the Ethics of the office (Lachman, 2014). One of the important ethical issues can arise for the employees when employees are taking advantages about use the phone calls at the companys cost. Sometimes employees use company's assets and they took those assets in their home like stapler, pins, papers etc. When someone gets the employment in the office accounting to the office constitution they provide leaves and other allowances. However in some cases it has been found that employs take several leaves beyond the allowed number where they breach the ethical consideration (Lachman, 2014). A company always set their own rules and regulations for the employees and other people who are related with the company. There are some rules and regulations has found that employees sometimes violet the rules. Therefore they make irrespirable issues between the company and their employment which is another issue for the employees. When employees are working in the office premises he or she never allowed communicating in offensive way. The use of abusive language is offensive communication can affect the job or the employment of that employee (Fahie 2014). When an employee got the employment in organization, he or she should not work in more than one place which is unethical and illegal employment. In the workplace discrimination of the other employees is another important ethical dilemma. An employee never discriminates another employee according to their gender, race, sex, marriage, disability or anything (Vardaman, Gondo and Allen 2014). Bullying in the workplace is never acceptable and against of ethics of the employment (Lachman, 2014). Values discussion Morality and value of ethical conduct both are difficult to maintain for the employees when they need to choose between the work ethics and their personal ethics principles. When the employers implemented the ethics policies in the workplace sometimes they failed to maintain such ethics which cause potential conflicts of interest with the employees due to the diversity of opinion values and the cultures in the workplace (Vardaman, Gondo and Allen 2014). So for consoling in both sides the employees must follow particular ethical principles for avoiding such dilemmas when such issues arise. Therefore the employees first identify the issues which cause the problem to that employee in the workplace (Lachman, 2014). According to the issues, the employee must apply the legal ethical guidelines or the code of contacts as per the constitution of the company after the identification of the ethical issues. The employee should make a decision which not affect his or her career and make no harm to other employees in the workplace. Therefore they implement the course of actions which should determine the nature and dimension of the dilemma (Fahie 2014). Sometimes the ethical issues has found from the employers of the companies they make the favoritism where the only favored or a particular person get all the emotions and benefits from the company. While due to this activity the eligible employee got neglected by the employer (Lachman, 2014). When in the office premises any health issues or diseases occur then it is the duty of the employer that they will take care of the employees. According to the environment situation of the office premises it also affect on the health of the employees. Therefore the other employees can make the consideration according to their eligibility of the employment to the higher authority of the workplace. Sexual harassment is another illegal issue in the workplace where the employees get sexually harassed by the employer or other employee which is against of the ethical consideration. The suffered employee must complain and take legal action against that employee or the employer because they breach the ethical consideration of the workplace. When employees terminated from the workplace without having any notice then several question arises due to the decision of the management of the companies therefore the terminated employee can ask for the proper reason for the termination and should provide with a prior indication and provide notice at least for 1 month because in between this one month that employee can get another job (Vardaman, Gondo and Allen 2014). Ethical questions and solutions In the workplace if any employee was bullying by another employee then it is necessary to take actions against that employee which is the ethical dilemma in the workplace. If any woman was sexually harassed by another employee of the employer therefore she should complain against that person and take legal action for the ethical issues in the workplace (Lachman, 2014). Disability is other important ethical issues in the workplace when someone works in the office with their disabilities some other employees take the advantages while bullying that person or disturbing or making fun of the disability (Vardaman, Gondo and Allen 2014). Therefore the authority of the company or the workplace should take legal action against those employees and that disable person also make the complaint against the employees because discrimination in the workplace is completely against of the Constitution of the company (Fahie 2014). Conclusion Ethical issues are most common in the companies for the employees are affected by such issues. Several committees and councils are introduced in the companies where the employees can make the complaint against any ethical issues and the company will take appropriate actions against such activities because ethical consideration is one of the important parts in the workplace. It is a breach of ethical duties in the workplaces (Vardaman, Gondo and Allen 2014). References Chughtai, A.A., 2015. Creating safer workplaces: The role of ethical leadership. Safety science, 73, pp.92-98. Clarke, T. and Boersma, M., 2017. The governance of global value chains: unresolved human rights, environmental and ethical dilemmas in the apple supply chain. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), pp.111-131. Fahie, D., 2014. Doing sensitive research sensitively: Ethical and methodological issues in researching workplace bullying. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), pp.19-36. Ferrell, O.C. and Fraedrich, J., 2015. Business ethics: Ethical decision making cases. Nelson Education. Holm, A.L. and Severinsson, E., 2014. Reflections on the ethical dilemmas involved in promoting self-management. Nursing Ethics, 21(4), pp.402-413. Lachman, V.D., 2014. Ethical issues in the disruptive behaviors of incivility, bullying, and horizontal/lateral violence. Medsurg nursing, 23(1), p.56. Resick, C.J., Hargis, M.B., Shao, P. and Dust, S.B., 2013. Ethical leadership, moral equity judgments, and discretionary workplace behavior. Human Relations, 66(7), pp.951-972. Vardaman, J.M., Gondo, M.B. and Allen, D.G., 2014. Ethical climate and pro-social rule breaking in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), pp.108-118.